Wednesday, February 04, 2015

Your Song That's the Ghost-est is Sure NOT the Most-est!

WHY.

The music is pretty groovy,

but the lyrics have been given up to and smeared with unnecessary demonic doo-doo.

So WHY.

It's not as if it should be unknown to you that GHOSTS = HARMFUL and DECEPTIVE DEMONS/ EVIL SPIRITS;

or that promoting "ghosts"/demons - promoting spiritism - is scripturally condemned and hated by Jehovah/Yahweh God Almighty (and so likewise His Son), that it is a disloyal atrocity towards the Heavenly Father and is harmful towards one's fellow man.

So WHY would you violate God and spiritually endanger and/or wrongfully "enable" masses of people - some looking for and loving deadly spiritual lies, but others largely spiritually clueness (even at this time of the end) - 

by putting out a spiritually decrepit and toxic GHOST SONG AGAIN (as with your "Father Christmas" song [though that one had its other problems too])?

WHY.

Oh sure, many of your throngs of false religious/false spiritual lie-philosophy "beLIEving" and/or otherwise spiritually-asleep/inebriated fans will continue to voice "praise the lord" over whatever songs you put out and whatever you do. And this song has a lot of evil to it too - so it will be real attractive to many, many people and should sell well also.

Nevertheless, that is creating, leading, hosting, and facilitating a large grouping of people that God is going to be angry at for their love (and your love of) and/or nonchalance towards what is


BAD.

WHY.

If you gave me a pen, I'm sure I could have written just as "cool" of a song WITHOUT
the TOXIC waste - but I am ALSO SURE that YOU COULD HAVE TOO - 

IF YOU WANTED TO.

Do yourselves a favor - and DON'T harm (or cause grief to) your fellow man again with an anti-God song(s) again this tour, or disappoint and anger the Maker either:

Please either fix-up or else scrap this song.

Please EVOLVE from the use of "ghosts" and "fairies" to flavor-up poems/songs  - they'd be better, less miserable over all, and more believable without them.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home